Appraisal is about enabling decisions. It is the process of analysis that combines the evaluation of an organisation’s functions and activities with an assessment of the risks associated with the creation and management of its information and records. To do this you need to look at the information and records of the organisation to determine their appropriate management over time, what their retention periods are and the disposal actions.
Appraisal is a proactive component of information and records management. When appraisal is carried out early it is possible to improve the management of information and records over their whole life by ensuring their timely disposal and maximising their benefits. It also reduces the risk that records are managed or destroyed inappropriately.
Benefits of appraising your records and information
can identify and manage information and records that are high risk, high value, or both, for immediate and ongoing business needs
is making efficient use of resources – information and records are not stored for longer than necessary taking up space and incurring storage costs, or migrated when they could be disposed of
can locate, retrieve, and use information and records easily
can understand which information and records have archival value for permanent preservation
When to appraise your records and information
We advocate a proactive approach to appraisal, either at point of creation or shortly after creation, when information is still ‘current’.
Appraisal may occur:
before records are created and during the design of business processes
when records are created - to ensure they are correctly managed over their lifespan
retrospectively for un-appraised records that have fulfilled their immediate purpose
when a public office creates or amends a Disposal Authority
when an administrative change or transfer of function occurs
when a local authority wishes to dispose of protected records
How to appraise your records and information
Appraisal decisions are made on the basis of information about the functions of an organisation, and the records management processes that support those functions. The following resources will help determine core functions and identify records into groups or classes:
Legislation, regulations, standards, code of practice
Corporate documents such as annual reports, statements of intent
Interviews with internal staff who have knowledge of business activities
Existing appraisal reports
Existing business classification schemes or taxonomy
Once you have gathered this information you need to organise the business activities that occur and their associated records into groups or classes and describe them.
An example of a core function of Archives would be:
Provision of access to open public records to government and the public
An example of two classes of records related to the core function of Provision of access to open public records would be:
Class of records = Strategic level access policies
Class of records = Reader application forms/database
These classes should be clear and specific enough to be related to the function that they are determined by. They should be easily recognisable by receivers and creators of the records.
Once the main functions and activities have been identified, it may become apparent that similar functions or activities can be grouped together, and some may need to be broken down even further into subclasses.
Once classes of records are identified, it is necessary to assign values, minimum retention periods and trigger points such as a date or event from which the retention period starts to each class of records. The following tools will help your decision-making:
Step 1. Appraisal criteria
We have developed selection criteria or principles that can inform decisions about retention periods and disposal actions for information and records of public sector archival value.
These principles are:
New Zealand public sector authority, functions and activities
Treaty of Waitangi - Te Tiriti o Waitangi
Individual and community knowledge, identity and memory
It is important to note that information and records with administrative or business value that may be important for an organisation for many years, may not also have archival value. Organisations will need to determine how long they need to retain these information and records to meet their business needs or legal requirements before implementing any disposal actions.
There will be several different views on the archival and business value of information and records from the owners, creators, contributors or subjects to users and future users. These should all be considered when applying these criteria.
Step 2. Stakeholder consultation
Different groups may value records in different ways and have different needs for accessing records over time. This should be considered when appraising records. This process ensures that interested parties can contribute to the process, are informed of the reasoning behind retention and disposal recommendations, and that the organisation is fully aware of the potential impacts of its decisions.
Most importantly, consultation gives the Chief Archivist confidence that informed decisions are being made about the disposal of government records. Resulting in timely authorisation and that information of the highest enduring value is transferred to our archives.
A successful appraisal requires a consultation process that includes stakeholders, both internally and externally. This has multiple advantages as it can:
inform the decision making from a range of perspectives
minimise the risk of miscommunication, and uninformed decision making
develop appropriate retention periods and disposal actions
identify where duplication of information may exist
promote a transparent and accountable appraisal process
Both internal and external stakeholders of the organisation should be identified, and their rights and interests considered when making appraisal recommendations.
2.1 Internal consultation
Internal consultation should occur only once groupings of function/records have been decided to avoid multiple rounds of feedback. The purpose of the consultation is to find out if internal stakeholders have any concerns about the decisions made to either transfer or destroy records. Often the records creator or user will have a strong view on records the long term value. The records need to be considered both within the context of the organisation, and across the whole of government, not just the activities of one work area.
2.2 External consultation
We acknowledge that there is more than one type of external stakeholder. There are external stakeholders in the sector of the organisation as well as in the records themselves.
Select groups can be targeted for consultation about specific classes of records. It might be useful to consult while you are drafting the appraisal report and schedule, particularly about classes or records that might have high public interest.
We encourage public offices to consider not only government organisations, but also non-government organisations such as:
professional and sector reference groups,
We recommend having a discussion with the internal staff that interact with external groups in some way during their day to day business. These staff will be able to identify external stakeholders.
Step 3. Communications
Communication channels are assessed to decide which is most appropriate to communicate clearly and effectively to each stakeholder. When assessing these you should consider:
a stakeholder’s frame of reference and the context in which they work
whether they will want to be consulted on the report and schedule. This is more appropriate for information professionals or those familiar with this process
whether they will be interested only in specific extracts of the appraisal report
Examples of face to face communication channels can include meetings, hui, fono, or workshops. Follow up communications help to confirm that stakeholders have received the documents and understand the process and their part in it.
Contextual information or guidance on the process will help support communications and get you the valuable input. These communications should be targeted to stakeholders who are best suited to test the decisions being made.
Contextual information should include:
Parameters of influence outline what decisions are already made due to legal constraints, intellectual and cultural property considerations and citizens’ rights and entitlements and so on. Let stakeholders know what can be changed by their feedback.
3.1.2 Process details
Details are required to provide stakeholders with appropriate background information, a description of the consultation process, the questions. It is crucial to provide details on time frames in which to respond, how to provide feedback and what follow up can be expected.
3.1.3 Consolidate feedback
Stakeholder feedback should provide you with enough information to determine an overview of opinions. It may be clear that the initial recommendations on retention periods or disposal actions are not agreed upon. What is important is that the opinions are considered and, where appropriate, the recommendations adjusted. This process needs to transparent and well documented in the final evaluation.
Step 4. Stakeholder report
The final report back to stakeholders on the decisions that were made as a result of their feedback should answer the following questions:
this is why we did…
Step 5. Appraisal report
Once you have completed your stakeholder report you can identify the records that are:
of high risk and high value to your organisation
are of value to the New Zealand public
able to be disposed of
This information can be used to create an information asset register for your organisation or allow you to begin the disposal or transfer process with archives.
The appraisal process and decisions should be documented in an appraisal report, this report provides the context and justification of any disposal decisions and should inform the management of information within the organisation. This report is later used as part of the disposal process to create a disposal schedule.
Last modified on 06 June 2019